UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY
EXECUTIVE WRITING COURSE

CONTENTS
ORGANIZED WRITING
|
Page |
2 2 3 4 5 |
Establish Your Purpose and
Audience Start Fast, Explain as
Necessary, Then Stop Use More Headings Write Effective Paragraphs Write Disciplined
Sentences |
SPOKEN WRITING
|
7 8 9 10 10 11 11 13 |
Use Personal Pronouns Talk to One Reader When
Writing to Many Rely on Everyday Words Use Some Contractions Keep Sentences Short Ask More Questions Listen to Your Tone Be Concrete |
CONCISE WRITING
|
14 15 16 16 17 17 17 |
Avoid "it is"
and "there is" Prune Wordy Expressions Free Smothered Verbs Shun "the ion
of" and "the ‑meet of " Cut Doublings Prevent Hut‑2‑3‑4
Phrase Avoid Excessive
Abbreviating |
ACTIVE WRITING
|
18 19 20 21 |
Learn the Symptoms of
Passive Voice Know the Three Cures Write Passively only for
Good Reason Practice on These Examples |
APPENDIXES
|
24 26 27 38 |
A—Simpler Words and
Phrases B—Editing for Conciseness C—Completed Staff Work Books About Official
Writing |
ORGANIZED WRITING
Too many writers start throwing ink before
they know what to aim at. When you
write, start with a clear sense of your purpose and audience, and arrange your
ideas so you get to the point fast.
Then write effective paragraphs and sentences.
Establish Your
Purpose and Audience
You'll save time and rewrite less if you plan
before you pick up a pen or start to dictate.
In the planning stage, analyze your audience in light of your purpose by
answering these questions:
What
is my purpose?
Who
are my readers?
What
are their interests?
How
much do they know already?
What
will make it easy for them to understand or act?
You'll discover ideas as you write, but
you'll wander less by keeping the answers to these questions in mind.
Start Fast,
Explain as Necessary, Then Stop
Timid writing creeps up on the most important
information. This kind of writing
starts with background, then discussion, and finally the so‑what. With luck, the main point follows a sign such
as therefore, consequently or due to the
above. This slow buildup isn't
chaotic; it enacts the way writers inform themselves. But the pattern isn't efficient, either. From the perspective of readers, it's the
clue‑by‑clue pattern of mystery stories.
Your writing should follow the newspaper
pattern. Open with the most important
information and taper off to the least important. Avoid mere chronology.
(Make your bottom line your top line.)
To find what to put first, think about the
one sentence you'd keep if you could keep only one. Many letters and memos are simple enough to have such a key
sentence, which should appear by the end of the first paragraph. The strongest letter highlights the main
point in a one‑sentence paragraph at the very beginning. Put requests before justifications, answers before
explanations, conclusions before discussions, and summaries before
details.
Sometimes, as in a complex proposal or a
reply to various questions, you may have many key points. They would overload the first paragraph if
you tried to put them all there. In
these cases, start with a general statement of purpose.
Here are some good beginnings:
We inspected the Directorate of Administration on 24
January 1994. Its overall performance
was satisfactory. Special‑interest
areas were also satisfactory
We request authorization to hire a full‑time
clerk typist or reassign one from the word‑processing center.
This memorandum summarizes how we are planning the
first step toward your goal of reorganizing the Air Force Reserve.
Sgt Frank Martin did a
superb job during our recent engine change.
Delay your main point to soften bad news or
to introduce a controversial proposal.
But don't delay routinely.
Readers, like listeners, are put off by people who take forever to get
to the point. In most cases, plunge
right in.
To end most letters, just stop. When writing to persuade rather than just to
inform, end strongly with a forecast, appeal, or implication that activates the
reader to do something. When feelings
are involved, exit gracefully—with an expression of good will. When in doubt, offer your help or the name
of a contact.
Use More
Headings
Any document longer than three pages probably
needs headings, so that readers can follow at a glance. Even a one‑page letter can benefit
from headings when topics vary widely.
Be informative; avoid relying on headings that use one or two vague
words.
For: Procedures
Try: How
to Complete DOD Form 76
For: Use
of Contractors
Try: How
Much Contractors May Charge
If you want the scoop, then
group, otherwise it’s poop (Poorly Organized Offers Perplexity)
Write
Effective Paragraphs
Keep paragraphs short. Cover one topic completely
before starting another, and let a topic run for several paragraphs if
necessary. But keep each paragraph down to roughly four or five sentences.
Divide long paragraphs where your thinking takes a turn.
Now and then use a one‑sentence
paragraph to highlight an important idea, such as the main point of a letter.
Use more lists. Look for opportunities to
divide paragraphs into lists. This technique is especially important for staff
papers and directives. As you can see, lists
Add white space for easy reading,
Show levels of importance,
Simplify--
Initial review,
Later revision,
Just remember to avoid dividing a paragraph
into more than the three levels shown here. If you use too many lists within
lists, readers will lose sight of the overall structure.
Take advantage of topic
sentences.
A paragraph may need a topic sentence—a generalization explained by the rest of
the paragraph. Then again, it may not. The decision to use a topic sentence is
among a writer's many judgment calls. A short paragraph announcing the time,
place, and agenda of a meeting might begin with. "Here are details about the meeting." Yet such a topic
sentence is probably unnecessary, for readers can follow the writer's thinking
without it.
But suppose you're writing a report on ways
to protect a particular military facility from attack. Your ideas are complex
and the evidence needed to make them clear and convincing is considerable. So
your paragraphs are likely to run longer and use more topic sentences than is
the case in letters. Here's a model:
Because so much of the complex borders the river,
its waterfront is especially vulnerable to attack. The naval station and the
shipyard next to it have 1.5 miles of waterfront on the river's north bank.
Together they have 13 dry docks and piers. Two piers are used to load fuel.
Most of the piers extend to within 100 yards of the center of the river's main
ship channel, and the river itself is only 900 yards at its widest.
The first sentence of the
sample gives the paragraph a bull's eye.
Because we know early where the facts are headed, the paragraph inspires
confidence. A lesser writer might have
left out the topic sentence or put it elsewhere in the paragraph or claimed
more than the facts support Be alert to the advantages of topic sentences, for
they help shape masses of information. Without them, some paragraphs make
readers shrug and say, "So?"
Write
Disciplined Sentences
So far we've talked about
organizing letters and paragraphs so they call attention to important
ideas. Now here are some important ways
to avoid sentences that mumble: subordinate minor ideas, use more parallelism,
place ideas deliberately, and try some mini-sentences.
Subordinate minor ideas. Besides clarifying the relationship between ideas, subordination
prevents overusing and, the weakest of all, conjunctions.
Use more parallelism. Look for opportunities to arrange two or more equally important
ideas so they look equal. Parallelism saves words, clarifies ideas, and
provides balance. The first words of
the series should use the same part of speech (verbs in the previous sentence).
|
For: Try: |
The symposium is a forum
for the dissemination of information and is not intended to establish
standards. The symposium is a forum
for sharing information, not for setting standards. |
|
For: Try: |
Effective 1 October,
addressees will be required to utilize the cost accounts contained in the
attachment. Addressees will cease reporting against cost accounts 1060, 2137,
and 2340. On 1 October, start
using the cost accounts in the attachment and stop using cost accounts 1060,
2137, and 2340. |
Place ideas deliberately. Start
and finish a sentence any way you like, but keep in mind that ideas gain
emphasis when they appear at either end. To mute an idea, put it in the middle.
Maintenance time may have to increase if more
structural problems develop. (mutes
increased time)
If more structural problems develop, maintenance time may
have to increase. (stresses
increased time)
For: I would like to congratulate you on your selection as our Employee
of the Month for June.
Try: Congratulations on your selection as our June Employee of the
Month.
Try some mini‑sentences. An occasional sentence of
six words or less slows down readers and emphasizes ideas. The principle is
illustrated in this next example from a general's memo to his staff.
I can get more information
from the staff if each of you gives me less.
Here's why. In a week,
about 110 staff actions show up in my in‑box. I could handle these in a week if all I did was work the in‑box. Yet about 70% of my time in the headquarters
goes not to the in‑box but to briefings.
I could handle that dilemma, too—by listening to briefings and thinking
about staff papers at the same time. I
don’t.
Look for opportunities in your own writing to
use mini‑sentences. They'll give it variety.
For: I apologize for not answering your letter sooner, but an
extended TDY kept me away from my desk for three weeks.
Try: I should have answered your letter sooner. I apologize. An extended TDY kept me away from my desk
for three weeks.
SPOKEN WRITING
Make your writing as formal or informal as
the situation requires, but do so with language you might use in speaking. This isn't a call to copy every quirk of
speech down to grunts and ramblings. And,
granted, some people speak no better than they write. Still, because readers "hear" writing, the most
readable writing sounds like people talking to people.
To make your writing more like speaking,
begin by imagining your reader is sitting across from you. Then write with personal pronouns, everyday
words, contractions, and short sentences.
Together with questions, good tone, and concrete language, these
techniques are the best of speaking.
Use Personal
Pronouns
Though you needn't go out of your way to use
personal pronouns, you mustn't go out of your way to avoid them. Avoiding natural references to people is
false modesty. Whether you're a senior
official or a subordinate, follow these principles:
1. Use we,
us, our when speaking for your organization.
2. Use I,
me, my when speaking for yourself.
3. Use you,
stated or implied, to refer to the reader.
Multiplied across an entire letter,
roundabout sentences like the next examples do severe damage. We would be laughed out of the room if we talked
that way. Ordinary English is shorter,
clearer, and just as official:
Not: Conceivably, funding constraints for this year will exceed in
severity the financial scarcities that have been anticipated.
But We may have less money this year than we anticipated.
Not: The Naval Facilities Engineering Command, by reference (a),
forwarded its draft master plan for the Washington Navy Yard to the Naval
Supply Systems Command for review and comment. The following comments apply.
But: In response to reference (a), here are our comments on your
draft master plan for the Washington Navy Yard.
Not: It is necessary that the material be received in this office by
June 10.
But: We need the material by June 10.
Or: The material must reach us by June 10.
It is and this command complicate the next example. They force readers to put back the pronouns
the writer took out. To make matters
worse, the first it is refers
to the reader, while the second refers to the sender.
Not: If it is
desired that Marines be allowed to compete for positions on the pistol team, this command would be happy to
establish and manage team tryouts. It is recommended that tryouts be
conducted soon to ensure…
But: If you allow Marines to compete for positions on the
pistol team, we would be happy to establish and manage the tryouts. We recommend that tryouts start soon
to ensure…
Military writers can profit from an axiom of
business writing known as the "you" attitude. It's a matter of showing greater concern for
the reader than the writer by using you more than I or we. Better to say "the service you
receive" than "the service we provide." Keep this distinction in mind, and when you
have a choice, show that you see things from your reader's perspective by
putting the emphasis on "you."
Can you overuse personal pronouns? In a few instances, yes. For example, you can use so many pronouns
that readers lose sight of what the pronouns refer to. Besides, some subjects don't lend themselves
to pronouns; the description of a plane's structure isn't likely to include
people. Also, criticism hurts fewer
feelings if delivered impersonally.
"Nothing has been done" avoids the direct attack of "You
have done nothing." Finally, if we
or I opens more than two sentences in a row, the writing becomes
monotonous and may suggest self‑centeredness. Still, military writers have a long way to go before overuse of
pronouns is a problem. Most of us will
benefit from using more natural references to people.
Talk to One
Reader When Writing to Many
When you're writing to many people but none
of them in particular, create in your mind a typical reader. Talk to that
reader by using you and your, stated or implied. Only one person
reads your writing at any one time, so the most readable writing speaks
directly to one reader.
Not: All addressees are requested to provide inputs of desired
course content.
But: Please send us your recommendations for course content.
Not: It is requested that all employees planning to take leave
in December fill in the enclosed schedule.
But: If you plan to take leave in December, fill in the
enclosed schedule.
When you write directives, look for
opportunities to talk directly to a user. Procedures, checklists, or other how‑to
instructions lend themselves to this cookbook approach. Imagine someone has
walked up to you and asked what to do. The following example is from an
instruction that repeated the duty officer dozens of times:
Not: The duty officer will verify that security responsibilities
have been completed by putting his/her initials on the checklist.
But: When you complete the inspection, initial the checklist.
Rely on
Everyday Words
The complexity of military work and the need
for precision require some big words. But
don't use big words when little ones will do.
People who speak with small words often let needlessly fancy ones burden
their writing. On paper help
swells to assistance, pay to remuneration, and visit
to visitation. The list goes on,
and so does the damage from word inflation.
Do you remember the dude in those old Western
movies who overdressed to impress the folks at the ranch? Overdressed writing fails just as
foolishly. Here are some commonly overdressed
words.
|
Not |
But |
|
commence |
start |
|
facilitate |
help |
|
optimum |
best |
|
promulgate |
issue |
|
utilize |
use |
Prefer short, spoken transitions over long,
bookish ones. Save long transitions for
variety. By preferring short ones, you help
set an ordinary tone for the rest of what you say. (And, yes, you can start sentences with conjunctions.)
|
Not |
But |
|
consequently |
so |
|
however |
but |
|
in addition |
also |
|
nevertheless |
still |
Avoid legalistic lingo. Let a regulation's number or a letter's
signature carry the authority instead of trying to put that authority in your
language. Write to express, not
to impress.
|
Not |
But |
|
aforesaid |
the, that |
|
heretofore |
until now |
|
herewith is |
here is |
|
the undersigned |
I |
All writers try to impress readers, but the
best do it through language that doesn't call attention to itself. Size of vocabulary is less important than
skill in manipulating the words you already know. See Appendix A for a list of simpler words and phrases.
Use Some
Contractions
Contractions link pronouns with verbs (we'd,
I’ll, you’re) and make verbs negative (don’t, can’t
won't). They're appropriate for
all but the most formal writing situations.
Yet even when your final product will be a formal reprimand, for
example, you can use contractions in drafts to help you write naturally.
The point is that if you're comfortable with
contractions, your writing is likely to read easily, for you’ll be speaking on
paper. And because the language is
clear, you're more likely to spot holes in your thinking that need to be
filled.
If contractions seem out of place, you may
need to deflate the rest of what you say.
In the next sentence, something has to go, either the opening
contraction or the inflated language that follows: "It's incumbent upon
all personnel to effect energy savings."
Written naturally, the sentence might read, "It's your job to save
energy."
Keep Sentences
Short
For variety mix long sentences and short
ones, but average under twenty words.
Though short sentences won't guarantee clarity, they're usually less
confusing than long ones. You needn't
count every word. Try the eye test:
average under two typed lines. Or try
the ear test: read your writing aloud and break up most of the sentences that
don't end in one breath. In the next
example, we first break the marathon sentence into manageable units and then
make the writing sound like speaking.
Not: It is requested that attendees be divided between the two
briefing dates with the understanding that any necessary final adjustments will
be made by DAA to facilitate equitable distribution. (29 words)
Uh: It is requested that attendees be divided between the two
briefing dates. Any necessary final
adjustments will be made by DAA to facilitate equitable
distribution. (12,13 words)
But: Send half your people on one day and half on the other. DAA
will make final adjustments. (12, 5
words)
Ask More Questions
A request gains emphasis when it ends with a
question mark. Do you hear how spoken a question is? Look for opportunities to reach out to your reader:
Not: Request this headquarters be notified as to whether the
conference has been rescheduled.
But: Has the conference been rescheduled?
Not: In an effort to improve the cost of office copier operation, it
is requested your firm complete the attached form relating to office copiers
which you would propose to rent/lease.
But: Would you let us know on the accompanying form what you charge
to rent or lease your copiers?
Listen to Your
Tone
Speakers have gesture, voice, and movement to
help them communicate. Writers only
have words on paper. Recognize your disadvantage
as a writer and remember to pay special attention to tone.
Tone—a writer's attitude toward the subject
or reader--causes relatively few problems in routine writing. The more sensitive the reader or issue,
however, the more careful we must be to promote good will. Tactlessness in writing suggests clumsiness
in general. When feelings are involved,
one misused word can make an enemy.
Imagine you are a reservist who has asked to
stay on active duty even though you have a serious illness. How does the following answer strike you?
Because you have failed to pass the prescribed physical examination, you will be removed from active duty.
Failed? Removed? These
words hint at crime and punishment. To
avoid such tactlessness, the tone should be positive.
|
Negative |
Positive |
|
Opportunity is limited. |
Competition is keen. |
|
Stop writing badly. |
Start writing well. |
|
Don’t use the small hoist. |
Use the big hoist. |
|
The cup is half-empty. |
The cup is half full. |
The positive approach removes some of the
sting from the reservist's answer.
Here's a possibility:
Given the results of your physical examination, we must transfer you to the Retired Reserve.
The structure of the letter was better than the
wording of the "failed" sentence. The letter opened by acknowledging
the favorable endorsements that accompanied the request to stay on active duty,
and it closed by thanking the reservist for his years of service. This tactful
arrangement helped to soften the bad news.
Now imagine you've asked for more time to
complete a correspondence course. Here's the last sentence of the letter that
turns you down:
If we can be of further assistance,
please do not hesitate to write.
Beware of rubber-stamp endings such as the
one you just read. They don't improve
good letters or save bad ones. To the
reader whose request has been denied, further assistance promises
further disappointment. The closing
sentence should be dropped entirely or tied to the rest of the letter with
positive language:
This setback aside, we hope you will take advantage of other correspondence courses available to you.
In all fairness to the writer, the letter did
explain the denial in enough detail to avoid any hint of a brush-off. Most no answers need some
explanation. Yes answers need
little explanation because readers get what they want.
Be Concrete
Without generalizations and abstractions, lots of them, we would drown in detail. We sum up vast amounts of experience when we speak of dedication, programs, hardware, and lines of authority. But such abstract language isn't likely to evoke in a reader's mind the same experiences it evokes in a writer's. Lazy writing overuses such vague terms. Often it weakens them further by substituting adjectives for examples: immense dedication, enhanced programs, viable hardware, and responsive lines of authority.
If you write, "The solution to low
morale and poor discipline is good leadership," your readers may feel warm
all over. But until you point out some
specific behavior meant by low morale, poor discipline, and good leadership,
neither you nor your readers can tackle the problem. Similarly, don't use a general word if the context allows for a specific
one. Be as definite as the situation
permits.
|
For |
Try |
|
|
|
|
aircraft |
plane |
|
plane |
F-16 |
|
improved costs |
lower costs |
|
enhanced method |
faster method? cheaper method? |
Vague, high-sounding language also weakens
job descriptions. Someone is said to "assist and advise in the
organization management aspects of manpower management." Another "serves as a system proponent
to transition from current capabilities to architectural projections." But what do these people really do? After all, a person who "serves as a
direct interface with interstate commerce" may be only a highway flag
holder.
Performance evaluations suffer when writers
make extravagant, unsupported claims. Someone actually wrote this next example,
and someone else has it ticking in his files.
Engaged in an assignment of a highly complex and technical nature, Sgt
Anderson has molded on-the-job experience, diligence, and perseverance to a
point where his seniors and supervisors can inevitably afford credence to his
work and the conclusions he derives therefrom.
An effective evaluation shows what a person
did and how well he or she did it. it's concrete enough to inspire confidence
in the writer's judgment about the ratee's performance and potential.
CONCISE WRITING
Concise writing includes only those ideas
that readers need, and it gives those ideas no more words than they
deserve. Careful audience analysis and
a willingness to be hard on yourself are essential for conciseness. Have you included too much background? Do excessive details bury your point? Are you keeping an irrelevant idea just
because it sounds ever so fine?
You can say too little, of course, and not
persuade your readers that a certain problem is serious or that your solution
is worthwhile. Sometimes simple courtesy
requires bulk; a one‑sentence letter of praise is just too abrupt. But the point remains the best writing, like
the best machinery, has no unnecessary parts.
Don't be overly concerned about conciseness
when you are getting your ideas on paper.
If you try to create and edit at the same time, you may bog down in
detail and lose sight of your point. When you polish your writing, though, look
for wordiness everywhere. Question the
need for every paragraph, every sentence, every word. The longer you take to say things the weaker you come across and
the more you risk blurting important ideas.
In the war against wordiness, the best weapon is a writer's
ruthlessness. Let's review some common
forms of wordiness that are easy to spot and avoid:
Avoid "it
is and "there is"
No two words hurt military writing more than it
is. They stretch sentences,
delay meaning, hide responsibility, and encourage passive verbs. Unless it refers to something
mentioned earlier, avoid it is.
Spare only spoken expressions such as "It is time
to..." or "It is hard to…" and an occasional pointing
expression such as "it is your job to…" (not someone else's).
|
Not |
But |
|
It is requested |
We request, please |
|
It is my intention |
I intend |
|
It is necessary that you |
You need to, you must |
|
It is apparent that |
Clearly |
|
It is the recommendation of this office
that |
We recommend |
Not: It is mandatory that all personnel receive flu vaccinations.
But: All personnel must receive flu vaccinations.
Not: It is requested that all badges be surrendered upon departure of
your group from the restricted area
But: Return all badges when your group leaves the restricted area.
Like it is constructions, forms of there
is make sentences start slowly.
Don't write these delayers without first trying to avoid them.
Not: There will be a meeting of the Human Relations Council at
1000 on 26 July in the main conference room.
But: The Human Relations Council will meet at 1000 on 26 July in the
main conference room.
Not: There are two alternatives offered in the report.
But: The report offers two alternatives.
Prune Wordy
Expressions
Wordy expressions don't give writing
impressive bulk; they clutter it by getting in the way
of the words that carry the meaning. In order to and in accordance with,
for example, are minor ideas that don't deserve three words. Here are some repeat offenders.
|
Not |
But |
|
for the purpose of |
for,
to |
|
in accordance with |
by,
following, under |
|
in order to |
To |
|
in
the event that |
If |
|
in the near future |
shortly,
soon |
|
be advised |
--- |
|
in the process of |
--- |
|
is responsible for |
--- |
|
the provisions of |
--- |
|
the use of |
--- |
Wordy expressions dilute the
next examples. Extended across a letter
or report, the savings from cutting such bloated language are considerable.
Not: In accordance with the new regulation, you may pay the
claim with a check in the amount of $300.
But: Under the new regulation, you may pay the claim with a check for
$300.
Not: In the event that this offer is satisfactory, be
advised your written acceptance must reach us before May 11.
But: If this offer is satisfactory, your written acceptance must
reach us before May 11.
Not: We are in the process of revising our form letters in
order to make them more readable.
But: We are revising our form letters to make them more readable.
Free Smothered
Verbs
Make your verbs do more work. The most important word in a sentence is the
verb, the action word, the only word that can do something. Weak writing relies on general verbs, which
take extra words to complete their meaning.
When you write a general verb such as make or give, check
to see whether you can turn a nearby word into a specific verb.
Not: This directive is applicable to everyone who makes use
of the system.
But: This directive applies to everyone who uses the
system
Not: The committee held a meeting to give consideration to
the proposal.
But: The committee met to consider the proposal.
Not: We will conduct an investigation into the incident before
making a
But: We will investigate the incident before deciding.
To be deserves special attention.
it's the most common verb in English and the weakest. Though we need it often, often we don't. Cut down on your use of to be in any
of its forms am, is, are, was, were, be,
being, been.
Shun "the
‑ion of'' and "the ‑ment of''
Words ending in -ion and -ment
are verbs turned into nouns. Whenever
the context permits, change these nouns to verb forms. By favoring verb forms,
your sentences will be shorter and livelier.
Not: Use that format for the preparation of your command
history.
But: Use that format to prepare your command history.
Not: The settlement of travel claims involves the
examination of orders.
But: Settling travel claims involves examining orders.
Or: To settle travel claims, we examine orders.
Cut Doublings
As the writer, you may see some differences
between advise and assist, interest and concern, or thanks and
gratitude. But your readers won't. Repeating a general idea can't make it
any more precise. Simple subtraction will overcome doublings such as these:
Not: We must comply with the standards and criteria for controlling
and reducing environmental pollution.
But: We must comply with the standards for reducingUenvironmental
pollution.
Not: The Department of Defense has developed plans for an orderly
and integrated system of executive and management advancement.
But: The Department of Defense has developed plans for a system of executive
advancement.
Prevent Hut ‑2-3-4
Phrases
Though you should cut needless words,
sometimes you can go too far. Avoid
hut-2-3-4 phrases—long clots of nouns and modifiers. Readers can't tell how the pieces fit together or where they all
will end. We must live with some
established hut-2-3-4 phrases such as Air Traffic Control Radar Beacon System,
but you can keep them out of whatever you originate by adding some words or
rewriting entirely.
Not: the Board of Inspection and Survey service acceptance trials
requirements
But: requirements by the Board of Inspection and Survey for
service acceptance trials
Not: training needs planning summary survey
But: survey of training needs for the planning summary
Avoid
Excessive Abbreviating
Excessive abbreviating is another common form
of false economy. Use abbreviations no
more than you must with insiders, and avoid them entirely with outsiders. Spell out an unfamiliar abbreviation the
first time it appears, like this:
Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC)
If an abbreviation would appear only twice or
infrequently, spell out the term every time and avoid the abbreviation
entirely. Put clarity before economy.
ACTIVE WRITING
Passive writing is wordy, roundabout, and sometimes downright confusing. To avoid this infectious disease, learn how to spot passive verbs and make them active. Most of your sentences should use a who‑does‑what order. By leading with the doer, you automatically will avoid a passive verb.
Doctor: When did you first notice your use of verbs
in the passive voice?
Patient: The
utilization was first noticed by me shortly after the military was entered. A
civilian agency has been joined by my brother. The same condition has been
remarked on by him
Doctor: Did you know that most of the verbs we
speak with are active? So are most of the verbs in newspapers and magazines,
the kinds of writing we like to read.
Patient: Well, it is believed by me that many verbs
are made passive by military writers. In the letters and directives that have
been prepared by this speaker, passive verbs have been utilized extensively.
Are problems caused?
If you heard the unnatural sound of the
patient's passives and know how to lead
with doers, you needn't read on. But the following technical discussion
may be helpful.
Learn the
Symptoms of Passive Voice
A verb in the passive voice uses any form of to
be plus the past participle of a main verb:
am is was were be being been
PLUS
a main verb usually ending
in en or ed
Unlike sentences with active verbs, sentences
with passives don't need to show who or what has done the verb's action. If a
doer appears at all, it follows the verb. But most passives in military writing
just imply the doer, a severe problem when the doer isn't clear from the
context. Passive verbs look like the following underlined words:
Ex: As a result of what has been learned, it is desired
that additional equipment testing be made.
(Be made is passive. The past participle of to make is irregular.)
Ex: Two units of blood were ordered for an emergency
patient whose hematocrit had fallen below 20 percent.
(Had fallen is active. Had isn't a form of to be. Besides, what did the falling? Hematocrit, which appears before
the verb.)
Know the Three
Cures
Put a doer before the verb:
Not: The part must have been broken by the handlers.
But: The handlers must have broken the part.
Not: The requests must be approved.
(By whom?)
But: The supervisor must approve the requests.
Not: Complete uniforms must be worn by all personnel.
But: All personnel must wear complete uniforms.
Or: Wear complete uniforms.
Drop part of the verb:
Not: The results are listed in the attachment.
But: The results are in the attachment.
Not: Then she was transferred to Maxwell AFB.
But: Then she transferred to Maxwell AFB.
Change the verb:
Not: Letter formats are shown in the correspondence manual.
But: Letter formats appear in the correspondence manual.
Not: The replacement has not been received yet.
But: The replacement has not arrived yet.
Write
Passively only for Good Reason
Now and then, write passively if you have
good reason to avoid saying who or what has done the verb's action. This
situation may occur if the doer is unknown, unimportant, obvious, or better
left unsaid:
Presidents are elected every
four years. (doer obvious)
The part was shipped on I
June. (doer unimportant, perhaps)
Christmas has been scheduled as a work day. (doer
better left unsaid)
Now and then, you may want to write a passive
sentence that names the doer. The
situation may occur when you need a transition from one topic to another. The following sentence would shift a
discussion from individual habit to group inertia:
Writing improvement is doubly difficult when individual habit is reinforced by group inertia.
Now and then, a passive sentence that names
the doer is appropriate if the rest of the paragraph is about the receiver of
the verb's action. The following
sentence might work in a paragraph about a general.
Then the general was hit by
a falling limb.
Finally, for variety or stateliness, you may
want the slow procession of a passive sentence such as this one on a monument
at the Air Force Academy:
Man's flight through life is
sustained by the power of his knowledge.
When in doubt, write actively, even though
the doer may seem obvious. You will
write livelier sentences (not, livelier sentences will be written by you).
Practice on
These Examples
The following paragraph comes from a letter
that proposes to expand a Scheduled Airline Ticket Office (SATO). Find the passives and try to make them
active. Then check yourself against the
revision.
During that time period, a
total of $644,000 was expended in the issuance of government transportation
requests (GTRs) for air travel. It is
estimated by SATO that an additional $10,000 per month would be generated
through casual travel. A summary of the
GTR revenue by month is provided in attachment 1.
Here is a sentence-by-sentence revision of
the passive paragraph:
During that time period, a total of $644,000 was expended in the issuance of government transportation requests (GTRs) for air travel.
We can cut 19 percent from the passive
sentence above just by shortening during that time period to during
that time and by omitting a total of. No writer has any excuse for not performing such simple
subtraction. To avoid the passive was
expended, we don't have to know who or what did the spending. The core idea is this: "During that
time, government transportation requests (GTRs) for air travel totaled $644,000." Now the verb carries more of the meaning, $644.000
appears in a stronger place and the sentence is slimmer by 43 percent.
It is estimated by SATO that an additional $10,000 per month
would be generated through casual travel.
This sentence is easy to improve because
doers follow both passive verbs.
"SATO estimates that casual travel would generate an additional
$10,000 per month." Though active
now, the sentence still needs work. We
can shorten generate to add, and additional to another,
and per to a. For
clarity, casual travel can become off-duty travel. These small improvements add up: "SATO
estimates that off‑duty travel would add $10,000 a month."
A summary of the GTR revenue by month is provided
in attachment 1.
Though the sentence would be shorter if we
simply dropped provided, the weak is would remain. Better to reshape the sentence:
"Attachment 1 provides a summary of the GTR revenue by month." But provides a summary is a smothered
verb for summarizes. So the best
improvement is this: "Attachment 1 summarizes the GTR revenue by
month." Here is the passive
original again, followed by the active version:
Passive: During that time period, a total of $644,000
was expended in the issuance of government transportation requests (GTRs) for
air travel. It is estimated by SATO
that an additional $10,000 per month would be generated through casual
travel. A summary of the GTR revenue by
month is provided in attachment 1. (50
words)
Active: During that time, government transportation
requests (GTRs) for air travel totaled $644,000. SATO estimates that off‑duty travel would add $10,000 a
month. Attachment 1 summarizes the GTR
revenue by month. (31 words)
The following letter, from an inspector
general, suffers from epidemic passives and other problems. On a separate sheet of paper, rewrite the
letter to make it organized, spoken, concise, and active.
Attachment 1 is forwarded
for review and comment as to concurrence or non- concurrence with the
recommendations of the subject to inspection.
Only those recommendations requiring action are forwarded. Comments are requested by 7 June in order
that approval and implementing can be taken.
Recommendations will stand as written if concurrence is not provided by
the above date.
Status reports or comments
concerning actions completed or in progress are not to be submitted at this
time. Guidance on status reporting will
be provided at a later date. (85 words)
Here's our version (you may have come up with
a better one).
Please concur or non-concur with
the inspection recommendations in attachment 1. To consider changes to these recommendations, we must have your
comments by 7 June.
Don't send status reports about actions completed or
in progress. Guidance on these will
reach you later. (40 words)
The second sentence of the original is
unnecessary. Elsewhere in the original
the writing is swollen: provided and submitted for sent, in
order that for so, and at a later date for later. But the worst damage comes from the seven
untouched‑by‑human‑hands passives. They force readers to pause and figure out just who is supposed
to do what. The revision avoids the passives by talking directly to a typical
reader. Note the personal pronouns,
contractions, and please.
Please, the first word of
the active version, is a convention of modern writing (and speaking) that helps
avoid many roundabout constructions. "Please send us two blivets" is
far more efficient than "it is requested that two blivets be
sent to this command." Real
men and women do say "please."
Appendix A
SIMPLER WORDS AND PHRASES
|
Instead of |
Try |
Instead of |
Try |
|
accompany |
go with |
Disclose |
show |
|
accomplish |
carry out,
do |
discontinue |
drop, stop |
|
accomplish
(a form) |
fill out |
disseminate |
issue, send
out |
|
accordingly |
so |
do not |
don’t |
|
accrue |
add, gain |
due to the
fact that |
due to,
since |
|
accurate |
correct,
exact, right |
echelons |
levels |
|
achieve |
do, make |
effect |
make |
|
actual |
real |
elect |
choose |
|
additional |
added, more,
other |
eliminate |
cut, drop,
end |
|
adjacent to |
next to |
employ |
use |
|
advantageous |
helpful |
encounter |
meet |
|
advise |
recommend,
tell |
encourage |
urge |
|
affix |
put, stick |
endeavor |
try |
|
afford an
opportunity |
allow, let |
ensure |
make sure |
|
aircraft |
plane |
enumerate |
counter |
|
anticipate |
expect |
equitable |
fair |
|
a number of |
some |
equivalent |
equal |
|
apparent |
clear, plain |
establish |
set up,
prove, show |
|
appear |
seem |
evaluate |
check, rate,
test |
|
appreciable |
many |
evidenced |
showed |
|
approximately |
about |
evident |
clear |
|
as a means
of |
to |
exhibit |
show |
|
ascertain |
find out,
learn |
expedite |
hurry, rush,
speed up |
|
as
prescribed by |
under |
expeditious |
fast, quick |
|
assist,
assistance |
aid, help |
expend |
pay out,
spend |
|
attached
herewith is |
here’s |
expense |
cost, fee,
price |
|
attempt |
try |
explain |
show, tell |
|
benefit |
help |
facilitate |
ease, help |
|
by means of |
by, with |
factor |
reason,
cause |
|
cannot |
can’t |
failed to |
didn’t |
|
capability |
ability |
fatuous numb
skull |
jerk |
|
category |
class, group |
feasible |
can be done,
workable |
|
close
proximity |
near |
females |
women |
|
combined |
joint |
final |
last |
|
comply |
follow |
finalize |
complete,
finish |
|
component |
part |
for example |
such as |
|
comprise |
form,
include, make up |
forfeit |
give up,
lose |
|
concerning |
about, on |
for the
purpose of |
for, to |
|
conclude |
close, end |
forward |
send |
|
concur |
agree |
function |
act, role,
work |
|
confront |
face, meet |
fundamental |
basic |
|
consequently |
so |
furnish |
give send |
|
consolidate |
combine,
join, merge |
has the
capability |
can |
|
constitutes |
is, forms,
makes up |
herein |
here |
|
construct |
build |
however |
but |
|
continue |
keep on |
identical |
same |
|
contribute |
give |
identify |
find, name,
show |
|
cooperate |
help |
immediately |
at once |
|
currently |
(leave out) |
implement |
carry out,
do, follow |
Appendix A (Cont.)
SIMPLER WORDS AND PHRASES
|
Instead of |
Try |
Instead of |
Try |
|
deem |
think |
in
accordance with |
under, by |
|
delete |
cut, drop |
in addition |
also,
besides, too |
|
demonstrate |
prove, show |
in an effort
to |
to |
|
depart |
leave |
inasmuch as |
since |
|
designate |
appoint,
choose, name, pick |
inception |
start |
|
desire |
wish |
in
conjunction with |
with |
|
determine |
decide,
figure, find |
incorporate |
blend, join,
merge |
|
develop |
grow, make,
take place |
incumbent
upon |
must |
|
indicate |
show, write
down |
programmed |
planned |
|
indication |
sign |
promulgate |
announce,
issue |
|
initial |
first |
provide |
give, say,
supply |
|
initiate |
start |
provided
that |
if |
|
in lieu of |
instead of |
provides
guidance for |
guides |
|
in order
that |
for, so |
(the)
provisions of |
(leave out) |
|
in order to |
to |
purchase |
buy |
|
in regard to
|
about,
concerning, on |
reason for |
why |
|
interpose no
objection |
don’t object |
recapitulate |
sum up |
|
in the
amount of |
for |
reduce |
cut |
|
in the
course of |
during |
reflect |
say, show |
|
in the event
that |
if |
regarding |
about, of on |
|
in the near
future |
soon |
relating to |
about, on |
|
in view of |
since |
relocation |
move |
|
in view of
the above |
so |
remain |
stay |
|
it is |
(leave out) |
remainder |
rest |
|
it is
essential |
must |
remuneration |
pay, payment |
|
it is
recommended |
I, we
recommend |
render |
give, make |
|
it is
requested |
please |
request |
ask |
|
justify |
prove |
require |
must, need |
|
legislation |
law |
requirement |
need |
|
limited
number |
few |
retain |
keep |
|
limitations |
limits |
return |
go back |
|
locate |
find |
review |
check, go
over |
|
lcoation |
place,
scene, site |
selection |
choice |
|
magnitude |
size |
similar |
like |
|
maintain |
keep,
support |
solicit |
ask for |
|
majority |
greatest,
longest, most |
state |
say |
|
minimize |
decrease,
lessen, reduce |
subject |
submit |
|
modify |
change |
submit |
give, send |
|
monitor |
check, watch |
subsequent |
after,
later, next |
|
nebulous |
vague |
subsequently |
after,
later, then |
|
necessitate |
cause, need |
substantial |
large, real,
strong |
|
notify |
let, know,
tell |
sufficient |
enough |
|
numerous |
many, most |
take
appropriate maeasures |
please |
|
objective |
aim, goal |
terminate |
end, stop |
|
obligate |
bind, compel |
that |
(leave out) |
|
observe |
see |
therefore |
so |
|
obtain |
get |
there are |
(leave out) |
|
|
|
there is |
(leave out) |
|
|
|
thereof |
its, their |
Appendix A (Cont.)
SIMPLER WORDS AND PHRASES
|
Instead of |
Try |
Instead of |
Try |
|
operate |
run, work |
this office |
us, we |
|
operational |
working |
time period |
(either one) |
|
optimum |
best,greatest,
most |
transmit |
send |
|
option |
choice, way |
transpire |
happen,
occur |
|
participate |
take part |
type |
(leave out) |
|
perform |
do |
until such
time as |
until |
|
permit |
let |
(the) use of
|
(leave out) |
|
personnel |
people,
staff |
utilize,
utilization |
use |
|
pertaining
to |
about, of,
on |
validate |
confirm |
|
place |
put |
value |
cost, worth |
|
portion |
part |
verbatim |
word for
word, exact |
|
position |
place |
via |
in, on,
through |
|
possess |
have, own |
viable |
workable |
|
preclude |
prevent |
warrant |
call for,
permit |
|
prepared |
ready |
whenever |
when |
|
previous |
earlier, pas |
whereas |
since |
|
previously |
before |
with
reference to |
about |
|
prioritize |
rank |
with the
exception of |
except for |
|
prior to |
before |
witnessed |
saw |
|
probability |
chance |
|
|
|
procedures |
rules, ways |
/ |
and, or |
|
proceed |
do, go on,
try |
|
|
|
proficiency |
skill |
|
|
Appendix B
EDITING FOR CONCISENESS
1.
TESS
is a long‑term, dynamic development effort to modernize and upgrade the
capabilities of major combatant ships and selected shore stations to rapidly
and instantaneously assimilate, correlate, process, and display the large
quantities of environmental, temperature, and weather data required to counter
atmospheric effects on fleet and shore based sensors and weapons systems.
2. It is requested that all two letter directorates or a designated representative from their staffs attend a preliminary meeting next Thursday at 1600 in order to lay the groundwork in advance for preparation for the upcoming POM input on the B‑2 development and acquisition program
Appendix C
COMPLETED STAFF WORK
Here are two testimonials on how to write for a busy boss. The first comes from an anonymous university administrator. The second is part of a memo by Army General Donn A. Starry to his staff. Together the statements argue for thorough legwork and compact paperwork.
Completed staff work
consists of studying a problem and presenting its solution in such a way that
the President need only indicate approval or disapproval of the completed
action. The words completed action are emphasized because the more
difficult a problem is, the more the tendency is to present the problem to the
President in piecemeal fashion. A staff member's duty is to work out details,
no matter how perplexing they may be.
It's so easy to ask the
Presidents what to do, and it appears so easy for them to answer. Resist that
impulse. You will succumb to it only
if you do not know your job. Tell Presidents what they ought to do, don't ask
them what you ought to do. THEY NEED ANSWERS, NOT QUESTIONS. Your job is to
study, write, restudy, and rewrite until you have evolved a single proposed
action—the best one of all you have considered. The President merely approves
or disapproves. Alternate courses of action are desirable in many cases and
should be presented. But you should say which alternative you think is best.
The theory of completed
staff work does not preclude the rough draft, but the rough draft must not be a
half‑baked idea. It must be complete in every respect, except that it
lacks the required number of copies and may not be neat. Do not use a rough
draft as an excuse for shifting to the President your burden of formulating the
action.
The completed staff work
theory may result in more work for the staff member, but it results in more
freedom for the President. This is as it should be. Further, it accomplishes
two things:
The President is protected from half‑baked
ideas, voluminous memoranda, and immature oral presentations.
The staff member who has an idea to sell can find a
market more readily.
When you have finished your staff work, the final
test is this: if you were the President, would you sign the paper
you have prepared and stake your professional reputation on its being right.'
If the answer is no, take it back
and work it over, because it is not yet completed staff work.
***
I can get more information from the staff if each of you gives me less. Here's why. In a week, about 110 staff actions show up in my in‑box. I could handle these in a week if all I did was work the in-box. Yet about 70% of my time in the headquarters goes not to the in-box but to briefings. I could handle that dilemma, too—by listening to briefings and thinking about staff papers at the same time. I don't. Most of the information I need is in the field. Much of my time must go there. In February, for example, I was here six days.
Within six days, add 15‑20 office calls a
dozen or so visitors, seven social engagements, two or three ceremonies, and 32
telephone calls. These are the
realities.
To work the problems of the central battle within
the restrictions of the realities, I need less information. But every piece of the less has to be
pure. Every piece must go through that
old filter of need to know, good to know, nice to know. I need the need part, not the
rest. You need to synthesize, condense,
stop out, boil down, distill, abstract—like a good newspaper editor.
Here's your challenge: reduce six months of work to
a 10‑page package, or a package to a page, or a page to a paragraph, or a
paragraph to a sentence, or a sentence to a few words, or a few words to a mode
or diagram. I need concepts, bottom
lines, central themes, summaries, abstracts.
Any action officer who can condense accurately is worth ten who run out
poop sheets by the pound. My measure of
completed staff work is less paper, not more.
.
BOOKS ABOUT OFFICIAL WRITING
A New Guide to Better
Writing by
Rudolf Flesch. Warner Books, 1982. A "how to" guide with sections on
clarity, pruning, choosing the right word, and adding punch to get the point
across. Devotes several chapters (with exercises) to curing troubling
grammatical mistakes.
Business Communications by Michael Adelstein and W.
Keats Sparrow. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1990. A thorough college text that
offers excellent examples of business memos, letters, and reports.
Effective Writing: A
Workshop Course by Internal Revenue Service. Government Printing Office, 1975. (Stock
No. 048‑004 01288‑0/Catalog No. T22.19/2: W 93/3). Excellent advice
on how to write official letters that are complete, correct, clear, concise,
and appropriate in tone.
Handbook of Technical
Writing, 4th
edition, by Charles T. Brusaw, Gerald‑J. Aired, and Walter E. Oliv. St
Martin's Press, 1992. Besides covering the elements of technical reports, this
reference text answers hundreds of questions, some of them fussy, on grammar
and punctuation.
Harbrace College Handbook, l1th edition, by John C.
Hodges and Mary E. Whetted. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1990. A popular
reference on grammar and punctuation. Thorough and sensible.
Plain English for Lawyers, 2nd edition, by Richard C.
Wydick. Carolina Academic Press, 198S. A lively, practical book for all who
care to write the law in readable English. Includes exercises and answers.
Revising Business Prose, 3rd edition, by Richard ~
Lanham. Macmillan Publishing 1991. Called "a quick self‑teaching
method of revision for people who want to translate bureaucratic prose, their
own or someone else's, into plain English."
Rudolf Flesch on Business
Communication by,
you guessed it, Rudolf Flesch. Barnes &
Noble, 1974. A short, practical book by the leading advocate of spoken writing.
Else Elements of Style, 3rd edition, by William
Strunk, Jr., and E. B. White. Macmillan, 1979. These tips on style are sure to
improve anyone's writing.
The Plain English Approach
to Business Writing by Edward P. Bailey, Ir. Oxford University Press, 1990. A readable,
concise guide by one of the strongest advocates of executive writing. Practical
advice ranging from punctuation and style of sentences to visual layouts and
using a computer to write.
The Tongue and Quill:
Communicating to Manage in Tomorrow’s Air
Force, Air
Force Pamphlet 4‑19, 31 August 1992.