JUNE 1, 2002
SYNOPTIC-SCALE PREDICTION PROJECT (P. Dallavalle)
Statistical Forecast Development (P. Dallavalle):
Development of warm season MOS equations to predict visibility and non-precipitating
obstructions to vision during all four forecast cycles of
the Global Forecast System (GFS) has been completed. Work on the
cool season equations is underway.
We are now working to develop techniques that generate MOS
guidance at spatial resolutions commensurate with IFPS requirements.
As discussed in previous progress reports, we've obtained
observational data from both the National Data Buoy Center (NDBC)
and the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). Observations from
over 100 buoys and C-MAN sites have been extracted from the NDBC
data, written in our developmental format, and are available for
use in the MOS system. We have begun development of wind speed
and direction forecasts for these sites based on all four cycles
of the GFS. Guidance will be available for projections to
72 hours after initial cycle time. The cooperative observer
network data from NCDC have been processed for use in our snow
fall prediction system as well as to supplement the maximum/minimum (max/min)
temperature prediction system. We're
currently developing a procedure to handle the different reporting times
encountered in the cooperative observer network. We've
also worked extensively with both the Hydrometeorological Prediction Center
as well as with the Office of Hydrologic Development
to obtain an archive of Stage III radar-estimated precipitation
amounts. This dataset will eventually be used to develop an
experimental, high-resolution precipitation amount forecast
product. Finally, we've begun to make significant modifications
in the MOS software system in order to handle the large number of
forecast data points required to initialize a 2.5 km grid covering the United States.
Operations and Software Support (M. Erickson): Alphanumeric
messages (FOUS12) containing max/min temperature forecasts for
nine of the NWS River Forecast Centers (RFC's) were updated on
May 14, 2002. The messages for four RFC's were modified to use
the GFS-based MOS guidance (contained in the MAV and MEX products)
and to include additional stations. The messages at five
other RFC's had been updated previously. The guidance for the
Day 11 min temperature was added to the messages for all RFC's.
This implementation completes current efforts to improve the
temporal and spatial resolution and quality of the max/min
temperature guidance provided to the RFC's.
For 30 years, we've generated max/min temperature guidance for
certain Canadian sites to support NWS operations along the
northern borders of the continental U.S. Updated alphanumeric
messages (FOCN20, FECN21) containing max/min temperature fore
casts for these selected Canadian stations were implemented
during this past month. New stations were included in the
messages which now display the new GFS-based MOS guidance. The
updated short-range message was added as of April 30, with the
extended-range message following on May 14.
MESOSCALE PREDICTION PROJECT: (D. Ruth)
Statistical Update Development (J. Ghirardelli): The LAMP group
obtained 2km WSI Radar data for periods in 2000 - 2002 from
NASA's Global Hydrology Resource Center. With the exception of a
few months when the data was unavailable, this completes the time
period of data we are interested in, which runs from 1997 until
the current. During this month, the radar archiving software
which processes the data and packs it into TDLPACK format was
finalized and tested on the 6 months of raw data representing the
cool season of 1998 - 1999. The remaining radar archive should
be completed by the end of June.
National Digital Forecast Database Development (D. Ruth):
NCEP's Hydrometeorological Prediction Center (HPC) drafted an HPC
NDFD Implementation Plan and ramped up 24/7 operational support
for the NDFD this month. The NDFD IWT agreed to extend the NDFD
prototype through the end of August in order to include an
evaluation of HPC support. The NDFD IWT will meet in September
to prepare a report.
We added new pages to the central NDFD server that display
information on forecast consistency along WFO boundaries. We
are logging forecast consistency statistics in a database so that
we can better identify problems and measure improvements in
generating coordinated WFO forecasts for the NDFD.
PRODUCTS GENERATION PROJECT (M. Peroutka)
IFP Product Development and Evolution (M. Peroutka):
By the end of May, IFPS10 was installed at 28 of the 30 Alpha Test WFOs.
These offices provided invaluable feedback on the functionality
of IFPS, suggesting new features and identifying problems. Many
of these ideas are being folded into future releases of IFPS.
MDL developers continued to work closely with Systems Engineering
Center (SEC) to schedule and monitor installations.
Much of May was also spent developing and testing IFPS11. This
version of IFPS will introduce the ability to support service
backup.
FORECAST EVALUATION PROJECT (W. Shaffer)
Forecast Verification Analysis (V. Dagostaro): We expanded our
evaluation of the impact of IFPS by computing PoP verification
statistics for a subset of the AVP sites. Similar to the max/min
temperature study, PoP forecasts were analyzed for a 2-year data
sample, with one year prior to IFPS implementation and one year
post-IFPS implementation, following a 3-month transition period.
Results of these comparisons show that no deterioration in PoP
forecasts resulted from the implementation of IFPS.
We modified and tested our data collection software to handle
additional PoP data transmitted by a few WFOs. During May, four
forecast offices installed a new version of the AVP data collection
software and began transmitting PoP forecasts and verifying
precipitation amount observations for the 4th period. This
software change also initiated the switch from NGM-based MOS to
AVN-based MOS guidance as the standard of comparison. We assisted
the AVP software developers in identifying possible data
problems. In addition, we coordinated with one WFO that plans to
transmit public weather data for seven new verification sites
beginning June 1, bringing the station total to 212.
COASTAL MARINE PREDICTION PROJECT (W. Shaffer)
Storm Surge and Wave Forecasting (W. Shaffer): "Was hurricane
Andrew a Category 5 hurricane?" That's the question that NOAA's
Hurricane Research Division of AOML is trying to answer. HRD
requested that we run SLOSH on a series of analyzed wind fields
to assist in determining what winds would be necessary to generate
the 16.9 foot storm surge observed after Andrew. We found
that, within the reasonable range of peak wind speeds, SLOSH
still cannot generate surges as high as the observed values at
the observation site. Our results are inconclusive.
We presented updated SLOSH simulation study results to emergency
managers of the Southeast Louisiana Hurricane Task Force. The
update shows some more flooding in certain areas compared to
previous runs. Much of the additional flooding results from
including several "cuts" in the levees, where roadways or rail
roads cross the levees. These features were not included in the
earlier model's database.