Presented at AMS Conference
79th Annual Meeting
14th Conference on Hydrology
Dallas, Texas
January 1999
1A.1 NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE RIVER FORECAST SYSTEM (NWSRFS)
OPERATIONAL
PROCEDURES FOR USING SHORT AND LONG RANGE PRECIPITATION FORECASTS
AS INPUT TO
ENSEMBLE STREAMFLOW PREDICTION (ESP)
SanjaPerica
JohnSchaake
Dong-JunSeo
Office of Hydrology
NOAA/National Weather Service
1325 East-West Highway
Silver Spring, Maryland 20910
1. INTRODUCTION
The portion of the National Weather Service (NWS) River
Forecast System that produces probabilistic
forecasts of stream flow and streamflow-related variables for
periods up to 12 months was originally
called the Extended Streamflow Predicition (ESP) system
(suggested name change is Ensemble
Streamflow Prediction - ESP). The ESP was not principally
configured to handle weather forecasts
as input, with the exception of a deterministic short-term
precipitation forecasts. Instead,
it used
multiple years of historical time series of precipitation and
temperature as possible future
meteorological realizations to create an ensemble of streamflow
traces. These traces were
then analyzed statistically to make a probabilistic forecast of
any streamflow-related variable.
In order to improve hydrologic predictions through weather and
climate forecasts, the NWS/Office
of Hydrology/Hydrologic Research Laboratory (HRL) has begun
development of strategies/
methodologies
that would facilitate incorporation of probabilistic weather and
climate forecasts into the ESP.
Probabilistic quantitative precipitation and temperature
forecast (PQPF) that would match
input requirements of the current ESP system would be a gridpoint
joint probabilistic
representation
of precipitation and temperature at spatial and temporal scales
that are relevant to ESP hydrologic
models, up to several months in future. An alternative form of a
good PQPF product would be a
QPF that has uncertainty inherent in the information (e.g.,
description of the likelihood that
precipitation amounts will exceed several selected thresholds) at
hydrologic relevant spatial
and temporal scales for all required lead times. In addition
some basic storm/weather type
information may be necessary to enable hydrologists to
reconstruct spatial and temporal correlation
structure of different rainfall fields/weather systems.
None of the current National Center for Environmental
Predictions (NCEP) QPF products meets
all of the desired ESP input requirements, and it is not expected
that such products would
be available in the near future, especially for lead times longer
than 2-3 days. Current weather/
climate outlooks products may provide valuable guidance
information for creating probabilistic
QPFs for the ESP system. but they require additional processing
before being used with ESP.
To introduce meteorological forecasts/climate outloks into
hydrologic forecasts, we (a) identified
available precipitation forecast/climate outlooks guidance
products, (b) selected a few products
based on their performance and characteristics relevant to the
ESP system, and (c) developed
basic strategies for producing grided probabilistic quantitative
precipitation forecasts at
hydrologic relevant scales from selected products.
Relative to the type of meteorological forecasts used, three
forecast intervals are identified:
(a) short-term period (days 1-2) where human-value-added
PQPF is used,
(b) medium-range forecast period (days 2(3)-14) where
weather information will come from the NCEP ensemble forecast,
(c) long-term forecast period (more than 2 weeks) that is
covered with Climate Prediction Center (CPC) monthly/seasonal
outlooks.
2. CURRENT STATUS
2.1 Meteorological Forecasts/Climate Outlooks Included
into the ESP
Currently, the following precipitation forecasts are part of
the ESP:
(a) Value-added day 1 probabilistic precipitation forecast,
generated once per day in
Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) and mosaiced by forecasters in
NWS field offices. These gridded
PQPF's contain information about the probability of precipitation
and two conditional exceedence
fractiles for 24-hr accumulation at an approximately 5,000 km2
scale. In addition, 6-hr expected
value QPFs are specified to provide information needed for
disaggregation of the 24-hr total
precipitation in four 6-hr subperiods. These grided fields are
utilized as input to the HRL
Ensemble Precipitation Processor (EPP; see Seo et al, 1999 for
more details) to produce an
ensemble of ESP-relevant precipitation time series. An
alternative product, used when value-
added PQPF is not available, is deterministic QPF for day-1 with
a temporal resolution of 6 hrs.
(b) One to 5-day forecasts made daily at the
Hydrometeorological Prediction Center (HPC)
of the NCEP. Precipitation forecast is given as an amount of
precipitation (in
inches)
expected to accumulate in a 5-day period: a temperature forecast
is expressed as a
maximum
and minimum anomaly from a 5-day climatological mean value in
degrees Fahrenheit.
(c) Six to 10-day categorical forecasts, that are issued
every Monday, Wednesday and Friday
by the CPC. A temperature forecast is expressed in one of the
following five categories: much-
below-normal, below-normal, near-normal, above-normal, and
much-above-normal. An expected
5-day-precipitation-total is given in one of the following four
categories; no precipitation,
below-normal, near-normal, and above-normal.
(d) Monthly/seasonal outlooks for the next month, and
thirteen 3-month outlooks starting
with a 2-week lead time, successively lagged by one month and
covering a period up to 13 months
in the future. Monthly and seasonal outlooks are released
approximately in the middle of each
month at the CPC. Products include maps fo probability snomalies
that indicate the likelihood
of surface temperature and total precipitation falling within the
lower, middle, and upper
third of their climatological distributions (below-normal,
near-normal, or above-normal
category.
1 to 5-day forecasts and 6 to 10-day forecasts of
temperature and precipitation are only
transient additions to the ESP, because of their nonprobabilistic
format. They will be replaced
with other probabilistic-type weather forecasts as described in
Section 3.
2.2 Operational Procedures for Using Precipitation
Forecasts
ESP utilizes forecaster-prepared PQPF information for day 1,
and uses the Ensemble Precipitation
Processor, a statistical model recently developed by the
Hydrologic Research Laboratory, to
generate an ensemble of precipitation time series at hydrologic
relevant scale (se Seo et al., 1999,
for more detail).
In order to incorporate nonprobabilistic 1 to 1-day and 6 to
10-day forecasts into the
ESP using the methodology developed for probabilistic
monthly/seasonal forecasts, these forecasts
are
transforrmed into probabilistic statements. This is accomplished
by assigning, in advance,
a distribution-anomaly number for each forecast number/category.
CPC monthly/seasonal outlooks are utilized in the ESP in one
of three ways:
(a) through modification of full set of historical
meteorological data prior to input into
ESP based on all or selected forecasts/outlooks. The criterion
for adjustment is that marginal
exceedence probabilities of the adjusted time series are
consistent with the issued forecasts
(see Perica, 1998),
(b) by applying an automated year weighting technique on
hydrologic time
series
relative to one selected climate forecast (so-called the CPC
year-weigh technique, or
post-
adjustment technique), and
(c) using a manual year weighting technique, which allows the
user to select subsets of historical
data representative of the given climate prediction.
3. FUTURE PLANS FOR INCORPORATING NCEP ENSEMBLE-BASED
WEATHER PRODUCTS IN THE ESP
3.1 Products to Be Used
As a result of recent developments in ensemble/probabilistic
weather forecasting, HRL and
the Environmental Modeling Center (EMC) of the NCEP started a
joint effort to develop and test
new approaches for coupling NCEP's global ensemble forecasts with
hydrologic models for making
hydrologic predictions over a range of time periods from 1 to 14
days.
At the EMC, an ensemble of 17 weather forecasts with the
NCEP global model is run operationally
on a daily basis with a 16-day prediction window. The NCEP then
provides users with forecasts
of approximately 20 different variables at 2.5 x 2.5
latitude-longitude grid boxes. Given
that precipitation inputs for the NWS hydrologic models are
typically mean areal precipitation
amounts accumulated over areas ranging between 100-10000 km2
during 1-12 hours, and that NCEP
global model precipitation forecasts are 24-hour amounts
accumulated over 2.5 x 2.5 degree
grid boxes, precipitation forecasts must be interpreted at
smaller time and space scales that
match input requirements of the NWS hydrologic models.
3.2 Strategies for Deriving Probabilistic Precipitation
Forecasts at Hydrologic Relevant
Scales from NCEP Global Model Ensemble Forecasts
Two different strategies are formulated in the HRL in order
to use global precipitation
estimates in the ESP. The first relies on GCM precipitation
forecasts, while the second uses
statistical methods to translate large-scale atmospheric fields,
such as sea level pressure
or geopotential heights, to local precipitation. The main
argument for the second approach
is that GCMs represent free atmospheric variables better than
surface variables (e.g., precipitation).
In the first approach, using GCM precipitation forecasts, ESP
will utilize either GCM-based
statistically post-processed precipitation distributions, or
directly a whole ensemble. A
disadvantage of using distributions instead of ensemble is the
need for reconstruction of space-
time rainfall structure at global model scales. An important
advantage is that statistically
post-processed distributions may significantly reduce ensemble
biases. In order to use ensemble
members directly, it will be unavoidable to adjust them prior to
their use in hydrologic models
to remove biases in the marginal distributions.
Once global model scale ensemble members are created, they
have to be downscaled to hydrologic-
relevant spatial and temporal scales. Three downscaling schemes
are considered. The first
scheme uses already developed EPP techniques. The second
downscaling scheme is based on the
hypothesis of scale invariance of standardized rainfall
gradients. The third scheme builds
a hydrologically relevant meteorological ensemble from a
historical record.
4. SUMMARY
The enhanced ESP system is envisioned to be a system that
will recieve, and take
advantage
of, probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasts (PQPFs)
and climate outlooks
to
create probabilistic river stage forecasts. Relative to the type
of meteorological forecasts
used, and methodologies developed to create ESP-relevant input,
three forecast intervals are
identified:
(a) short-term period (day 1) where human-value-added PQPF
is used,
(b) medium-range forecast period (days 2-14) where weather
information will come from the
NCEP ensemble,
(c) Long-term forecast period (more than 2 weeks) that will
be covered with CPC monthly/
seasonal outlooks
In the current stage of development, ESP can take advantage
of shor-term PQPF and monthly
and seasonaly climate outlooks produced at the CPC.
Non-probabilistic 1 to 5-day forecasts
and
6 to 10-day forecasts are only transient additions to the ESP
that currently provide weather
information for a medium-range forecast period. However, these
forecasts will be replaced
by NCEP global ensemble forecasts once methodologies for
incorporating ensemble forecasts into
ESP are fully developed and tested.
5. REFERENCES
Seo, D.J., S. Perica, and J.C. Schaake, 1999: An Ensemble
Precipitation Processor (EPP)
for Generating Precipitation Ensembles for the Next 24 Hours.
This preprint volume.
Perica S., 1998: Integration of Meteorological Forecasts/Climate
Outlooks into an Ensemble
Streamflow Prediction System. 14th Conference on Probability
and Statistics in the Atmospheric
Sciences, 78th AMS Annual Meeting, preprints, Phoenix,
Arizona, 130-133.
|